22 hours ago22 hr Moderator No. Hey, Judge, I'm over 21; buy me a 5th!Frankly, Judge Charlotte, I do give a damn. 🤬https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2026/07/31/college-athletes-extra-eligibility-court-ruling-fifth-season/91130269007/?utm_source=usatoday-sports-strada&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=usatbaseline&On3Tracking top college basketball players who could return...Tracking the top college basketball players exploring a fifth year of eligibility following Friday's Colorado court ruling.On3Tracking college football players who could return for 5t...On3 has compiled a list of players who could return to college football for a fifth year with Friday night's injunction.
2 hours ago2 hr Moderator No. Managing a college football roster is difficult; however Coach Dan Lanning does a great job. The new 5 for 5 rule won't affect the Ducks according to Dan.Oregon Ducks On SIOregon Coach Dan Lanning Shares Uncensored Thoughts on Ne...Recently, the NCAA ruled in favor of a new five-for-five proposal that changes college football and college sports as a whole. This means that college athletes
1 hour ago1 hr No. I have returned to the forum out here in Indiana. I see my last post was back in February. Why some may ask ... well this is the best forum I have found since following my first one in 1995. CIVIL discussion can take place even if you are the opponent. Plus I love talking football.Well this new ruling ... what a mess. It will get sorted out most likely for 2027 season but what about now? The rosters are set at 105, NIL money paid or on contract, freshmen on campus ... I always said never mix politics and sports. Too bad the overpriced NCAA admin couldn't run their own organization.
1 hour ago1 hr No. 5 for 5? This will advantage teams that are proven to develope guys into NFL draft picks at a high level. Lanning and his staff are near the top of this list. I'd say top 3. Very few teams are capable of managing a roster at the level Lanning has proven over the past few years. Dan has aced all three levels. HS recruitment, TP and retaining those currently on the roster. The gap between the haves and have-nots will get wider. It ages cfb another year (kinda) allowing more time for the cream to seperate. Does this open the door for a reshift of cfb again? Seems so but who knows?
Create an account or sign in to comment