February 18, 20224 yr Moderator No. Staying with a 4 team field through the existing contract that expires in 2025 was confirmed by the CFB Playoff Committee today.  If the conference stays at 9 conference games which appears most likely to be the case, will a Pac-12 team make the field prior to anticipated expansion of the field in 2026? Likely not happening unless USC can defeat Notre Dame and go 12-1; or, the Ducks or Utah go 12-1.  With the Alliance scheduling agreement on the rocks I don't think the conference can weaken the inventory of games by adding a 4th OOC game. But the conference can help the cause by getting rid of divisions, ending the CA school scheduling agreement and assuring that the 2 best Pac-12 teams play for a conference title.  This decision was not unexpected but it is leaving millions and millions of dollars on the table before 2026.  Â
February 18, 20224 yr No. Disappointing to say the least, but hardly unexpected. Â These clowns should run for congress, they'd fit right in. Edited February 18, 20224 yr by noDucknewby
February 18, 20224 yr Author Moderator No. On 2/18/2022 at 2:31 PM, kirklandduck said: How about 'make it no,' instead of 'make it so?'
February 19, 20224 yr Author Moderator No. On 2/19/2022 at 6:02 AM, Duck 1972 said: It may be a blessing in disguise. Right now at least there's a chance of not having a SEC against SEC for the championship every year. That's what I see with the way the expansion as proposed would have worked out. SEC vs SEC, Bama vs UGA, has happened 2 out of 8 seasons. But its not just the final 4 that's the problem, it's the fact that season after season the SEC puts at least 3 and often 4, teams into the lucrative NY 6 bowls. This and the SEC champ being in the final 4 every season, just gives more recruiting ammunition to a conference that doesn't need it.  I get the angst over Sankey sub rosa taking in OK/TX from the B12, but not to expand is shooting the ACC and the Pac-12, in particular, in the financial foot. Another short sighted, parochial, stupid decision by people who should know better. For goodness sakes, UCLA is $60M in the red! Is anyone in the ACC and the Pac-12 paying attention to the bottom line?  SEE ABOVE: noDucknewby nailed it!
Create an account or sign in to comment