As the article states, "If you’re confused, it’s OK."

Risky business: College sports' new enforcement entity remains on shaky ground despite a costly arbitration victory - Yahoo Sports

The green in Nebraska is clear as mud.

There's battle lines being drawn,

And nobody's right if everybody's wrong. 🤑

It reads like NIL collectives are now forced to “throw mud” at the CSC to see what sticks.

The CSC creates the illusion of regulating NIL deals, when all that is happening is collectives throw a larger number of smaller deals together to meet the criteria that the CSC sets as their standard.

The winner is whoever gets paid the $750 million in arbitration costs….can we get a piece of that action?

An interesting piece here about the future of college football. Could have some impacts on revenue share across the spectrum if some of the concepts can pass the legal tests.

For those sensitive to the word "Trump" just try to read for the concepts.

https://theamericansdigest.com/trump-administration-seeks-federal-intervention-in-ncaa-operations/

From HDucks' post:

Hummm "Legendary football coach Nick Saban has emerged as a key advisor". Gee, now that the playing field is wild open to payments, one of the main guys behind "lunch bag payments" doesn't like the new non rules/guard rails.

Oh, and limiting coaches' salaries . . . good luck with that.

[Simple solution, if you don't like the current situation then get out the "education" system.] 🫢

I'm made as Hades, and I'm going to bend over and take it up the tailpipe!

Sark, full of sound and fury, signifying ??? If you're part of the problem, can you be part of the solution?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/sec/2026/05/12/texas-football-steve-sarkisian-rips-cfp-selection-committee-ncaa-ole-miss-rules-24-team-playoff/90033796007/?utm_source=usatoday-sports-strada&utm_medium=email&utm_campai