All Activity

Next road loss, SUC should leave Riley on the tarmac. I kept asking my youngest(who went to UO) why they weren't stopping the clock. It sure looks like the Riley hire isn't showing a good return on their investment...

It’s SUC…they don’t need to practice a two minute offense. The players were clueless about how much time was on the clock. That should be embarrassing to the entire coaching staff.

Cardale Jones was drafted in the fourth round, the 139th player off the board. He also led 4-seed Ohio State to a victory over No. 1 seed Alabama in the Sugar Bowl. 48 players on the Buckeyes 2014 roster went on to the NFL. One of CFB's best rosters ever.

Im very happy with yesterdays win and just want to take it one game at a time. What happens at the end of the season will be what it will be.

Two-thirds of the season remains to be played. Keep on quacking and improving. Before Urban Meyer won a title, Ohio State lost at home to VA Tech. Before Ryan Day's team won four straight games to win a title, Ohio State lost two games, including a loss in Autzen and a bad loss to Michigan. Keep improving and get hot at the right time?

Good call! Upon further review, the Irish won 11 straight, and UCLA won 8 straight. Post corrected. Thanks to you and others for the correction.

Uhh, Ducks lost a national championship game to a Buckeye team starting its third-string QB.

The D will continue to improve. If you told Dan before the game that the USC O in LA would be held to 27 points, I think he would have gladly taken it. The same number of points SC scored last season in Autzen.

Your home team Dawgs have a bite! Nice win. Oklahoma battled, but Venable's team is a mess on O. Vandy at home, then at Bama, with GameDay likely to be in Tuscaloosa. I know Kirby will not overlook any opponent, especially Auburn at home, but the Cocktail Party in Atlanta should be a slobber knocker. Florida should be arrested for the assault on Ole Miss. Gunner Stockton, the Heisman front-runner?

#6 is Hill. Amazing shot, though. She's got skills!

😏

Remembering the 2015 natty. 😫

Not gonna lie, I actually did pretty damn well on these picks 😂 I went 13 for 16 on winners, which is 81.25%. The three I missed were Louisville over Wake Forest, Michigan over Iowa, and Penn State over Wisconsin. I’m probably happiest about picking Florida over #4 Ole Miss and Mississippi State over #19 Missouri. Those weren’t just easy “pick the higher ranked team” calls either. Florida absolutely hammered Ole Miss 52 to 28, and Mississippi State beat Missouri 31 to 24 after I had predicted 30 to 27. A few of the score predictions were surprisingly close too. I had Miami winning 52 to 7 and they won 52 to 3. I had Texas Tech winning 48 to 10 and they won 49 to 14. I also had Texas winning by four and they ended up winning by three. So yeah, 13 out of 16 on the winners. I’ll take that 😂

Good Gosh....I hope you can hear this!

Thanks Charles. It's always fun to play. Even though I'm a season ticket holder since 1995, I'm probably the least knowledgeable fan on this forum. I'm also not inherently lucky, so I can't explain it. This is my third prediction win in four years. Thanks again.

I'm sorry Steven, I completely disagree. If there EVER was a defining moment-it was those very decisions he made. And I recall very intently how much the entire football world jumped on Lanning after that game. Duck Nation had a virtual meltdown. This forum literally had a post questioning Dan Lanning as a Head Coach (not to criticize or put anyone down-but that is a concrete fact-we as a group went literally nuclear because of those decisions). Let me explain again why I felt Lanning's decisions were not only spot on, but demonstrated some coaching chops people ignored at the time. The first thing Lanning said after the game when questioned was this "we were very prepared to call those plays in that situation". I will explain in as few words as I can why that was extremely significant. People discount the fact the Kalen DeBoer has ten years experience on Dan Lanning as a Head Coach. Two of the three plays were WIDE OPEN. Let me say that again- on one of the plays, a lessor elite player raised his hands just before running into the end zone with nobody near him for almost ten yards. Bo Nix threw his pass to a guy he knew and favored as a target. He locked in on the guy he wanted instead of reading the play. On the second play TWO WRs were open. This one was to seal the victory. Again, Nix looked exclusively to his left and neglected both receivers that were open at two separate times on the play. That is called POOR EXECUTION. It goes further than that. Though Will Stein said he got out coached, he did not. Nobody on God's Green Earth contemplated that the more experienced Kalen DeBoer also planned for those very situations. Both coaches absolutely knew the game in Seattle was going to come down to plays that had to be converted in order to win. I have not seen one expert, coach, fan or even the angels mention that fact. But it is a substantial fact. The implications of that fact demonstrated Dan Lanning and Will Stein called plays that countered exactly what they believed DeBoer and his staff were going to throw at them in defense of those plays. Lanning and Stein won both of those battles. In fact, they went 2-1 in those key situations despite having ten years less experience. So while everyone lost their minds and experts, pundits and former coaches loudly questioned Lanning's decision making, I was sitting there thinking "this guy is miles ahead as a coach". He just outcoached a guy that has ten years on him. His players failed to execute. And if they had, Lanning would have been called a genius, well ahead of his time (another fact nobody can seriously refute). Furthermore, Lanning also pointed out the decisions didn't effect the game in the manner people believed it did. He is correct. Because quite frankly, had he converted any of those first two, the complexion of the game would have changed. Losing by 3 points didn't happen because Dan Lanning chose two 4th down calls instead of earning 6 points. Both DeBoer and Lanning would have called every single play after both of those Non-decisions completely differently had he even kicked one of those field goals. Again, not one soul mentioned or acknowledged that-and that is another fact people overlooked. Dan Lanning CLEARLY has proven that those decisions that day was a pretty damn good indication of the type of coach he is. I know Millions will disagree. But I not only believed that, I said it at the time. In that very thread that questioned Lanning's decision making ability and his future as a coach. Given how successful Lanning has been, I have even been surprised. The guy finds ways to win. He gets the most out of a group that does outlandish things to lose, and often enough is not as "talented" as we consider them (in my eyes performance is a key indication of talent-execution is a demonstration of talent as much as the capacity of the players playing the game). That sounds like an oxymoron, but let me tell you, Lanning hasn't had one linebacker half as "talented" at Oregon that he had at Georgia. NOT ONE. And he still wins. I could go on, but let me conclude with this-Lanning takes risks. Not in ways we prefer, but he is aggressive. He is unapologetic about it. And he has delivered. And he delivered again-and trust me-I had my doubts yesterday. Dan Lanning proved in that loss he was a very elite coach. And just about EVERYBODY MISSED IT.

Ouch!

I am NOT related to this guy...but I agree with him!

Boo!