1 hour ago1 hr Moderator No. Here's the O line depth chart as listed in the forum links. I'm no O line expert so I don't know if some of the names aren't actually in this order or are injured or playing different positions than listed. But with that said based on this info. Where is the problem?Left TackleAddison (So) 4 Star"Nacho" (Fr) 5 StarLeft GuardUtu (So) 5 StarRogers (Sr) 3 StarCenterLaloulu (Sr) 4 StarBrooks (Jr) 4 StarRight GuardIuli (Sr) 4 StarBennet (Sr) 3 StarManning (So) 4 StarRight TackleCrader (Jr) 4 StarTofi (Fr) 4 StarWilson (Sr) 3 StarStascausky (So) 4 StarAgain, where's the problem? Sure there could be a bust here or there. That happens all the time but this roster is chalked full of 4-5 star guys clear across the line in the two deep. With this much talent you should be able to field a competent squad.If it's not the players then it has to be the coaching. Then I'd need it explained to me how the same coach that has put together award finalist lines year after year has suddenly forgotten how to do it. That just doesn't make sense.That would then lead to the plays being called. Are the schemes so bad that a star studded line with an elite coach all of a sudden can't block themselves out of a wet paper bag? What gives?I'm much more confused than angry. Can anyone explain the problem? The math just isn't mathing in my brain.
1 hour ago1 hr No. Star rating??? Raiola was a 5 star, did he look like that yesterday to you? Did any of those linemen look 4 star?
1 hour ago1 hr Author Moderator No. 3 minutes ago, 1Ducker1 said:Star rating??? Raiola was a 5 star, did he look like that yesterday to you? Did any of those linemen look 4 star?Non of it looks even 1 star and that's the question. It's hard to believe ten 4/5 star guys have all been so highly over rated. Even if some are, it's hard to believe you couldn't piece together a decent line out ten 4/5 star guys. It's hard to believe a coach with as much success as Terry couldn't get good results with 3 star guys. It's all hard to believe which is why I pose the question.
55 minutes ago55 min Author Moderator No. I hate to say it but with all the non mathing math, it feels like the coaching staff is just cashing checks and mailing it in. It also feels like the highly paid NIL guys are doing the same. With NIL not being tied to actual performance, this has always been the danger in this scenario. Three out of four of Oregon's next games will be against two dangerous up and coming teams (Nebraska and Northwestern) and an old school road grader (tOSU). Things could get real ugly fast.
11 minutes ago11 min No. Raiola, after pinpointing passes again USC, could not hit the broad side of a barn yesterday. How a guy with his talent played that way is unexplainable. Dante, even healthy, has problems when pressured and lacks some aggressiveness.Both QB's are talented. The bottom line to me, I suspect this team is loaded with talent but has some really lousy coaching. For a program that is looking for a NC to obtain blue blood elite status....it is a shame because these type teams don't come every year. 7 turnovers.....seriously!
1 minute ago1 min No. Wasn't there a heavy turnover from last year, thus a lack of experience and, from that, a lack of unity?
Create an account or sign in to comment