All Activity

Thanks, DD. I saw this, and I wondered whether the source was the QB's agent or his family. $7.5 million to play QB in Starkville? Do bell manufacturers have this kind of money? With the SEC ready to impose significant fines if member teams exceed the House threshold? Smell test not passed.

Can't tell if it is grey or white pants....too much black.

SEC Week 12 - Wofford at Ole Miss, TN Tech at MS State, Chattanooga at Alabama, Samford at Auburn.

Mississippi State quarterback, Kamario Taylor, is reportedly about to sign a $7.5 million dollar deal to bring him back next year... "and that number could jump to around $9 million if he collects incentive bonuses." And, as of September 26th, the kid was out for the season with an injury. As the article points out, the kid is going to make mid-first round NFL money next season. I'm definitely wondering about Dante. What a crazy college football world it has become. https://www.foxnews.com/outkick-sports/mississippi-states-kamario-taylor-finalizing-reported-7-5-million-deal-expensive-college-football-move

I found this site works well applying all the B1G tie-breaker rules. It has all the B1G games in the last 3 weeks on the bottom. You highlight the winner of each game for whichever scenario you want to see play out and then hit calculate and it applies the current B1G tie-breaker rules to see who finishes in what place for the B1G Championship game: https://bball.notnothing.net/big10.php?sport=fb (For any of this to really get interesting, USC must first beat Indiana)

Ducks 31-17 2 4 286

Ducks!!! 30-18 1 Wolverine TO 3 Duck Sacks 273 Duck Passing Yards

DUCKS WIN! 24-10 2 2 248 yards

Michigan wins 38-13 0 takeaways 0 sacks 113 passing yards

Hey, Whit, shut your pie hole! https://sports.yahoo.com/college-football/article/after-kyle-whittingham-noted-the-size-of-oregons-nil-budget-dan-lanning-responds-with-a-dig-at-michigans-10-million-buyout-for-former-oc-jason-beck-205111634.html

DUCKS 35-17 3 TO 3 SACKS 268 YRDS

27-3 Ducks 2 TO 4 sacks 225 pass yrd

Oregon Ducks quarterback Dylan Raiola meets with the media ahead of Saturday's matchup against Michigan to discuss his recent improvement, Oregon's offensive growth, the challenges of facing Michigan's talented defensive front, and the Ducks' College Football Playoff outlook. Raiola explains how his confidence has grown over the last two games, why he's motivated to avoid past struggles, and how Oregon's offensive line has developed into a more consistent unit. He also discusses the return of wide receiver Jeremiah McClellan, the chemistry within Oregon's receiving corps, and how "Operation Swagger Back" has helped the Ducks rediscover their enjoyment of football. Other topics include preparing for potentially heavy rain at Autzen Stadium, improving first-down efficiency, and why Oregon's focus remains on Michigan rather than the latest College Football Playoff rankings. Oregon Ducks freshman defensive back Devin Jackson meets with the media to discuss his breakout performance against Ohio State, his incredible toe-drag interception, and his growing role in Oregon's defense following the season-ending injury to Aaron Flowers. Jackson explains what went into his highlight-reel interception at Ohio Stadium, the special connection he shares with former Oregon safety Verone McKinley III, and why he's focused on playing like a veteran despite being a freshman. He also discusses why he chose Oregon, how head coach Dan Lanning has helped him develop, and why he models his game after former NFL star Kam Chancellor and Oregon standout Jevon Holland. Jackson also shares how Oregon's veteran defensive backs have helped him adjust to college football and why he's embracing the responsibility of a larger role in the Ducks' secondary.

Everything Dan Lanning said about Michigan, Teitum Tuioti's injury and Dylan Raiola's growthOregon coach Dan Lanning discusses Michigan, Kyle Whittingham's recruiting comments, Dylan Raiola's growth and the Ducks' College Football Playoff hopeshttps://247sports.com/college/oregon/longformarticle/everything-dan-lanning-said-about-michigan-teitum-tuiotis-injury-and-dylan-raiolas-growth-292576313/

It is that time of the week again to have fun with our game prediction contest! Guesses on other threads don't count--only those here, and only those entries completely filled out with the tiebreakers are valid entries. Let's have fun with it as we have so many years in the past... Let me know: --Which team wins: --Score: --How many turnovers created by Oregon? --How many sacks of the opponent by Oregon? --How many passing yards by Oregon? My prediction of Oregon vs. Michigan: Oregon 26-13 2 2 182

Yes, but those could be the 2 loss teams ahead of us who end up with their 3rd loss.

5th graders wouldn't... 6th grades might because they are cheeky little gits. 9th grader wouldn't though.

https://247sports.com/college/oregon/article/cfp-chairman-explains-why-oregon-is-the-highest-ranked-three-loss-team-in-latest-playoff-rankings-292569602/ This right here. If Oregon puts up 21+ on a Mich D that has not surrendered more than 21 all year, the committee will continue to reward them. 27 points puts Oregon on the bubble at minimum. +4 spots would be my guess. The committee is showing a lot of love for Oregon.

Speaking of the P word, where did the PO committee's pod-ranking nonsense come from? The ranking criteria outlined in PO committee's ranking charter have no mention of 'pods.' "We can't consider 7-2 Tennessee's victory over 7-2 Alabama because the two teams are not in the same pod." 🤬 Are you not ashamed? 5th- and 6th-graders would not try to sell this kind of voodoo 'logic'. BAFFLING!

I’m not getting the B1G championship is the “only way” in logic. It’s definitely the “only sure way in”, but we’re already the highest ranked 3 loss team, and to me at least, it seems like a couple 3 loss teams might just make it in this year. The fact the committee members are already discussing us tells me all I need to know….imo 😆

The P-Word is back! 👌👍😁😎😍❤️ I blame this erratic season on not being able to P! 🥸

I guess the Jock's not on him?