All Activity

If I had to pick . . . NEITHER ☹️

The offense. No question.

The last two games, under 60 yds offense at half-time. The offense.

Agree on all points…..and mystified by the decision to open the 2nd half with Brock as the QB. I’m sure Dan will explain it, but I was shocked when he trotted out there.

Game options picked for the networks: Pacific Time Rutgers at Northwestern - 9:00 - Peacock Indiana at Michigan - 9:00 - Fox Oregon at Illinois - Noon - B1GN Iowa at Minnesota - 12:30 - FS1 Michigan State at UCLA - 12:30 - CBS USC at Wisconsin - 4:30 - NBC byes: Maryland, Nebraska, Ohio St, Penn St, Purdue, Washington

Here we go. Oregon Ducks vs. Nebraska Cornhuskers live updates, analysis

The offense was good on the final drive - that is what is startling to me. The same guys (with exception of QB) who were terrible all game, all of a sudden, learned how to play football. By the way, when a QB came in who was a threat to go deep, the O line could block. Probably because 5 didn't have to block all 11. What surprises me in a bad way is how bad Thomas was today and how bad Raiola was vs UCLA. What are they doing in practice all week that they can't get ready for Saturday? And I am surprised in a good way how good the defense has gotten since the first two games.

Easy - That the offense is so bad. But as Raiola said “we preserved in the end”. 🤣 A couple of things: 1) I can’t believe Lanning waited that long to make the switch, but I guess it worked. 2) The defense is really, really good.

Limited to those two: that our offense is bad. What actually surprises me is that our offense seemed limited for three quarters two games in a row, and then improved.

Charles, the most surprising thing to me was that DL left Brock in for 3 quarters. Huh?! How can we be surprised about the crappy offense? We have seen it before. We have won before. For me, that was the most boring game I've ever watched beginning to end ... AND with the most exciting finish.

Reminds me of the downfall of Helfrich. He did good his first year with Chip's players, then it tanked. Lanning can bring in the player talent, but he is garbage on offense unless he brings in a top tier OC.

That the offense was so bad. Seventeen Points. Thought we would lose. But I won my bet... Never again

I am amazed, speechless, and asked myself that same question, Charles. I think though up reflection, the offense.

Which is more surprising to you....that we won, or that our offense is so bad?

Way better

I would be shocked if the boosters would be willing to sit back and watch another year of this. For as much as they are spending, they are going to want to see accountability and change.

I just don't get why it took this long to make the change, it's inexcusable, Thomas has shown no ability to drive the ball, at least Raiola has proven he can win at this level, it's simply insane that Lanning waited this long simply because he likes Thomas as a former walk on. If I was defensive player I would be pissed. We can not throw these screen passes, it makes no sense whatsoever.

Dudes running hard

After watching 3 quarters of this football game, I think our offense was ruled out of the game too.

Raiola looks much better, but still almost nobody getting open.

I'm telling you. We should go for 3 right now 😆

This reminds me of some of the early 1980s teams, with good defenses and no offense. It occurred to me.

I live life between 1am and 6pm m-f. Yet here I am. The saying is true "we love a good train wreak"

With week we get worse. So punt on first down and hope for the best?

So let me get this straight. Your offense has not converted a 3rd down in 6 quarters of football and you have 57 yards of offense and you start using your timeouts to get the ball back in hopes you can go 90 yards with no timeouts at the end of the half with a 3rd string walk-on QB? Mario thought that was idiotic. If Lanning doesn’t clean house on the offensive side of the ball after this game…..