43 minutes ago43 min Administrator No. Which is more surprising to you....that we won, or that our offense is so bad? Mr. OBD
40 minutes ago40 min No. I am amazed, speechless, and asked myself that same question, Charles. I think though up reflection, the offense.
39 minutes ago39 min No. That the offense was so bad. Seventeen Points. Thought we would lose. But I won my bet...Never again
37 minutes ago37 min No. Charles, the most surprising thing to me was that DL left Brock in for 3 quarters. Huh?!How can we be surprised about the crappy offense? We have seen it before. We have won before. For me, that was the most boring game I've ever watched beginning to end ... AND with the most exciting finish.
36 minutes ago36 min No. Limited to those two: that our offense is bad. What actually surprises me is that our offense seemed limited for three quarters two games in a row, and then improved.
36 minutes ago36 min No. Easy - That the offense is so bad. But as Raiola said “we preserved in the end”. 🤣A couple of things:1) I can’t believe Lanning waited that long to make the switch, but I guess it worked. 2) The defense is really, really good.
29 minutes ago29 min No. The offense was good on the final drive - that is what is startling to me. The same guys (with exception of QB) who were terrible all game, all of a sudden, learned how to play football. By the way, when a QB came in who was a threat to go deep, the O line could block. Probably because 5 didn't have to block all 11. What surprises me in a bad way is how bad Thomas was today and how bad Raiola was vs UCLA. What are they doing in practice all week that they can't get ready for Saturday?And I am surprised in a good way how good the defense has gotten since the first two games.
22 minutes ago22 min No. 11 minutes ago, Mudslide said:Charles, the most surprising thing to me was that DL left Brock in for 3 quarters. Huh?!How can we be surprised about the crappy offense? We have seen it before. We have won before.For me, that was the most boring game I've ever watched beginning to end ... AND with the most exciting finish.Agree on all points…..and mystified by the decision to open the 2nd half with Brock as the QB. I’m sure Dan will explain it, but I was shocked when he trotted out there.
17 minutes ago17 min Moderator No. 24 minutes ago, Charles Fischer said:Which is more surprising to you....that we won, or that our offense is so bad?If I had to pick . . . NEITHER ☹️
16 minutes ago16 min No. 5 minutes ago, DUCKED said:Agree on all points…..and mystified by the decision to open the 2nd half with Brock as the QB. I’m sure Dan will explain it, but I was shocked when he trotted out there.I would have put Raiola in after the first two possessions.
14 minutes ago14 min No. It's startling to me that DR was not given the entire first half to see how he could rebound from UCLA. Then it was startling to see the offensive plan was to play not to lose. Then it was startling to me to see BT not get benched to start the 3rd quarter. It's very startling that we won a game by only playing 1 quarter of intentional offense. But man I enjoyed the cage our D made for that squirrelly QB.
8 minutes ago8 min No. Offense. It’s offensive. LolOregon football for decades had me believing we would get a touchdown on every drive yet today I doubted that we could even get a first down. Still predictable play calling, O—line issues, receivers can’t get open two games in a row. At what point does Drew really need to be stepped aside. And what is with Guys not knowing rules on special teams…coaching errors everywhere. Edited 7 minutes ago7 min by AllOregon
Create an account or sign in to comment