He was 11-11 with three TD passes in a limited appearance....and looked VERY accurate. More accurate than Moore?

Again...there were at least two plays where Dante Moore was throwing to the short field receiver without pressure, while WRs were getting open downfield for big potential gains or touchdowns. Is that Moore's lack of vision, or what he is being told to do? I do not know...

With all the receivers open downfield and ignored vs. Oklahoma State....I cannot help but wonder if we would have won that game if Raiola was at QB?

Now, I am not asserting that Raiola should replace Moore; Dante has earned his spot, and the damage to him and Oregon would be significant. But if he gets hurt, and when we consider next year--we look good with Raiola.

I thought Raiola looked like a football player last night. He was slinging it and making plays. Scoring td. Love the side arm.

I will just say I was very impressed.

Raiola is also much more mobile than Dante Moore, which would be a big help with this year's offensive line.

By no means am I hoping for it, but It would be very interesting to see what Coach Lanning would do, if the Ducks were down big at halftime against USC.

Moore throws a nicer deep ball still.

Both looked in command of the huddle which is a good thing.

But I have a feeling that Raiola might have more of the "it" factor. He just has better vision from the short sample size we got.

He looked like he might be more athletic, and I think that's something that we could really use with the struggles we have with the O-line.

Everyone though needs to slow down since it was against a team that might have it's hands full against the best high school teams in Texas or Florida.